Liu Zhixiang, a 47-year-old “unlocked king†in Chengdu, recently smashed the horse cell. Recently, in an interview with the media, he disclosed the chaotic situation of the Chengdu unlocking industry. According to Liu Zhixiang, many Chengdu thieves can easily learn the unlocking technology from the unlocking training institutions, and even have no record management measures. In the author's impression, it is very rare for people in the industry to stand up and real-name exposure to unlock the industry. In fact, the problems in the unlocking industry are not new but are often overlooked by people. In the face of this problem, people often attribute the culprit to social morality, government law enforcement, and so on. But the author found through investigation that these are too one-sided. Just like traffic congestion in Chengdu, you can't just blame the driver, any party in the government. Changing the status quo of the unlocking industry is almost a systematic governance project. Let me talk about the phenomenon first: the chaotic industry The unlocking training has become a thief of the Whampoa Military Academy? Entering relevant keywords on Baidu or Google, we can easily find out that some of the thieves captured in various places have learned technology from training institutions in Guangzhou, Chengdu, Zhejiang and other places. The author then found through the search that there are a lot of information about Chengdu's unlocking training institutions, and there is basically no qualification review and other matters in the admissions brochure, let alone implementation. Some agencies can even provide training to open a bank ATM machine business. At the beginning of this year, the Jinniu District Public Security Bureau disclosed a case of thief joint locksmiths entering the room. According to the suspects, they used technology to unlock a total of eight crimes. Such cases are very much in the news. Readers can click here to search for themselves. The figures disclosed by the Harbin Public Security Bureau indicate that 30% of the burglary cases in the city were entered using “technical unlockingâ€. The figures for Chengdu are not disclosed by the relevant departments. Formal institutions are not standardized In the media's report on Chengdu Lock King Liu Zhixiang, the author also found such an interesting detail. In the interview, Mr. Liu Zhixiang has always stressed that “the training institutions have opened the door for thievesâ€, resulting in fewer and fewer people who have learned to unlock in his formal institutions, and condemned them, but Mr. Liu is not careful to disclose. He also encountered the situation of thieves coming to learn to unlock the lock. "There was a man who came to learn to unlock the lock. After learning for 3 days, he stole a battery car parked downstairs." Since it is a formal institution, why is it? Is it difficult to put an end to this phenomenon? The author undoubtedly questioned Mr. Liu's courage and integrity, but wanted to explain this: It is not enough to rectify the lock-up industry and rely on some "black training". The government has been fighting Anyone can easily think of the chaos of the lock-up industry and increase government supervision. To this end, the government has also carried out some actions. In 2008, the Chengdu Municipal Bureau of Industry and Commerce issued the “Notice on Launching Special Actions on Clearing, Renovating and Unlocking Operational Behaviors of the Operating Industry†to clean up and rectify the special actions of the unlocking industry. The object of rectification at that time was mainly aimed at unlocking tools and illegally unlocking companies. According to media reports, various magical unlocking tools were readily available in lotus ponds and other places. You can open a hardware or small appliance repair shop, and even someone will deliver it to your door. This situation has improved this year. For example, the unlocking company that you contacted through the property management system or 12580, 114 is generally prepared in the Public Security Bureau. However, the filing here is only for filing, and does not mean auditing supervision. Let me say the reason: the industry is chaotic, everyone is responsible The regulations are vague: only one company in Chengdu is not a “black household†The unlocking industry is basically in a blind spot in the law, and it is not a special industry recognized by the Ministry of Public Security (the printing industry is all, the unlocking industry is not). Whether it should be franchise, government, or complete market competition, local practices vary. In fact, in the unlocking market, all three things are there. The author through the Chengdu Industrial and Commercial Bureau enterprise information database query found that: the business scope clearly marked the unlocking one, only one enterprise. According to the author's understanding, the enterprise that can be found through the authoritative public information inquiry platform such as Chengdu 114 is this one. But obviously, there are still many companies in Chengdu that are engaged in unlocking business. The author further inquired that some of the industrial and commercial registration materials of Chengdu's unlocking companies indicate relatively vague words such as “locking maintenance†and “repairing locksâ€, and some of them are highly recognized by the public. The author is very confused: those enterprises whose business scope is "repairing locks" and "locking repairs" are entitled to unlock the business. Is it the same thing to unlock and repair locks? Regarding the management of the two, we hope that the relevant departments will give an authoritative explanation. Industry autonomy: powerless Many people believe that as long as the government has strict supervision, it will be able to put an end to the chaos of the lock-up industry and completely ban the "shares", but this idea is wishful thinking. The reason is very simple, the government is renewed, and there is no way to monitor the highly mobile stall vendors. The common practice in foreign countries is to conduct self-discipline through industry associations and officially unlock the interests of merchants. Unfortunately, the legislation and social mechanism in this aspect of China are still far behind. According to media reports: Guangzhou's individual reputable locksmiths have long been actively seeking normative management. Wang Yongqiang, the manager of Guangzhou Lihao Lock Service Co., Ltd., which is known as the “lock kingâ€, has repeatedly contacted the local civil affairs departments and other departments, hoping to be included in its management and set up industry associations, but unfortunately, it has repeatedly hit the wall. However, since last year, Jiangsu and other places have begun to reform this, but it has not been popularized. The public lacks safety awareness: bad money drives out good money Even if the government has a series of systems, the industry has spontaneous supervision, but as long as the citizens do not take the initiative to check the information of the unlocked personnel, it will give the perpetrators a chance, and all systems are equal to the display. The author's investigation found that the service attitude and speed of many unlocking companies in Chengdu are commendable, but the only thing that lacks is security. What is more important is that consumers rarely have this awareness. First, the company's unlocking staff seldom took the initiative to show their qualifications, and consumers did not take the initiative to ask. Second, the unlocking staff is too lazy to tell any security issues, not to mention the signing of a contract or agreement. Most consumers are too lazy to ask questions, and they can't change locks afterwards. In addition, the public's demand for “shares†is also very real. According to the requirements of the formal company, consumers must provide a series of certification items such as housing property certificates, but some households are for privacy reasons or the documents are lost. Therefore, I would rather choose to "share a stall", which is convenient and affordable. To a certain extent, this has caused the effect of bad money driving out good money. The solution: the government is not reliable in the business of unlocking The above cited a question as to why Chengdu's business scope is registered as only one company that is unlocked. Is the government setting up industry access issues considering security issues? If so, why can the government not directly engage in the unlocking business and provide it to the public free of charge? In fact, many netizens have suggested this. Chengdu also has an official unlock service, which is 119. But the service of 119 has no advantages except for free. First of all, it can only overturn the wall, which is bound to scare the neighbors. Secondly, 119 should arrange the time according to the police force configuration at that time. Sometimes you even need to wait a whole day, because the service of 119 is not provided according to your needs, but is provided according to its own resource allocation. This is equivalent to the state-run canteen in the planned economy. You have to eat a bowl of spring noodles. But the waiter told you that the country’s flour index was used up. Some cities in China have set up a linkage mechanism between unlocking and 110. There is an unlocking demand business that first hits 110. The police arranges legally registered unlocking companies. The price is also market-oriented, but there is a problem of power rent-seeking: How can you Avoid 110-duty leaders who arrange relatives. In short, it is unreliable for the government to provide the unlocking business. In 2008, Chengdu also proposed to open all the civil unlocks and manage them in a unified manner. Fortunately, it was not implemented. However, this does not mean that the government has no regulatory duties. The key to the problem lies in: What step should the government take in regulation? It does not harm the quality of service and market fairness, but also guarantees security. This is a test of the level of government. Conclusion: In short, the problem with the lock-up industry is that it can be completely solved without full market competition or with full return to the government. It requires the government to carry out appropriate and unsupervised supervision. It also needs to have sufficient self-discipline in the industry. It also requires the citizens to be conscious and spontaneous. The three are indispensable. After all, most of the problems in our cities are also true. PHROXI ABS pull-down spray head Kitchen Faucet made of high quality materials.This well-designed faucet features a ceramic disc cartridge. Pull Down Kitchen Faucet,Commercial Kitchen Faucet,Brass Kitchen Faucet,Kitchen Faucet Brass HESHAN CAIZUN SANITRAYWARE CO.,LTD , https://www.nbcaizunsanitaryware.com
Why is the Chengdu lock-up industry so messy?